we need to get started. .. >> to defending united states. i hope the privity would vote against this amendment and the staid missile the fed's even if the president does not provide well-heeled sometime. >> it does not need to be personal. north korea is still with with the alaska facility. with regard to the east coast, it would take of missile from iran which is sealed the reason, the russian icbm cannot be defended with the system. so look gained only at iran. today? no. can they? north korea? no. i read have a warhead presented a threat to us? and no. this president has been clear. i assume if he is not president the next president says the same thing. >> i am reclaiming my time. you would argue closure of missile defense site within 300 miles of your district. people on the east coast believe we should have a robust protection cahal looking to iran. i hope people will defeat your amendment and not diminish our capability. >> the chair recognizes mrs. sanchez. >> i would ask my colleagues to support this amendment by representative garam